d9aa638ad7
shorter
2021-07-22 15:11:38 +02:00
11cdc63a27
use reasonable load case, even for compile test
2021-07-22 14:00:25 +02:00
5ac592eb9e
initialize L_(i/p), L_(i,p)0
2021-07-22 12:31:10 +02:00
69cc0b528b
do calculation for initialization
2021-07-22 11:38:03 +02:00
aa03e59306
same statement, different syntax but silences gfortran runtime warning
...
with automated LHS, compiling in DEBUG mode (tested for mesh solver)
gives:
home/m/DAMASK/src/phase_mechanical.f90:1010:43: runtime error: signed integer overflow:
-9223372036854775808 - 1 cannot be represented in type 'integer(kind=8)'
2021-07-22 11:24:10 +02:00
5b66db8a39
only mechanics at the moment
...
will be extended, but most likely differently
2021-07-22 10:12:43 +02:00
eb834b635d
unify notation with grid
...
consistent style: Symbols, not descriptions.
also removed untested/unused loginc functionality. Once load cases are
written in YAML, we can introduce the scaling as in DAMASK_grid
2021-07-22 08:48:44 +02:00
173a5f8e55
less public/unneeded variables
2021-07-22 07:48:01 +02:00
9767866c1e
cleaned+updated test
2021-07-22 07:24:36 +02:00
574cfd7034
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/development' into more-flexible-L
2021-07-22 00:20:33 +02:00
de7ef43095
documenting/silencing gfortran
2021-07-21 23:49:24 +02:00
aace5d25a8
initialization needed
2021-07-21 23:19:41 +02:00
58a7921966
no need for temp, pack instead of reshape for 1D array
2021-07-21 22:45:04 +02:00
b817c620a3
let the computer count
2021-07-21 21:25:33 +02:00
23077fd58c
testing coordinates
...
I don't understand why this pattern exists (with w(2) = 3, w(3) = 2),
but it exists
2021-07-21 19:42:53 +02:00
5a04a1d661
let the computer do the counting
2021-07-21 19:41:14 +02:00
c56979e2ad
single source of truth
2021-07-21 18:47:19 +02:00
000007ba59
better test automatically
2021-07-21 18:06:37 +02:00
b1ba64e6af
understanding floating point precision
...
double can use 16 or 17 significant figures
- if the leading number is high (above 5 or so), only 16 figures are
significant.
- a trailing 1 is never significant
2021-07-21 18:04:50 +02:00
76572e4ca9
standard notation
2021-07-21 16:34:33 +02:00
e3e9dfdc60
following paper
2021-07-21 16:29:57 +02:00
8feeda6f05
phase_mechanical_elastic should store data related to elasticity
2021-07-21 16:23:21 +02:00
fc5237fa80
using central values
2021-07-21 15:46:38 +02:00
8259cb3cdc
notation as in paper
2021-07-21 15:03:28 +02:00
2fff191421
[skip ci] updated version information after successful test of v3.0.0-alpha4-117-g9f2c37761
2021-07-21 14:56:53 +02:00
b2e94974ca
short names
2021-07-21 14:52:37 +02:00
f25dee4c3a
quad points updated and rounded based on literature values
2021-07-21 14:34:18 +02:00
df1fe39dc2
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/development' into write_ipdisplacements
2021-07-21 13:30:12 +02:00
9427885b43
updated private
2021-07-21 13:29:59 +02:00
9f2c377612
Merge branch 'drop-1d-tensor-support' into 'development'
...
L, P, F, etc. are second order tensors
See merge request damask/DAMASK!415
2021-07-21 11:25:35 +00:00
9d349f8a7c
symbolic notation
2021-07-21 06:50:28 +02:00
b5bf1d525e
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/development' into more-flexible-L
2021-07-21 06:36:05 +02:00
6f19113072
L, P, F, etc. are second order tensors
2021-07-21 06:19:04 +02:00
575c84ad86
[skip ci] updated version information after successful test of v3.0.0-alpha4-114-gb98819a36
2021-07-20 20:01:14 +02:00
b98819a36c
adjusting names
2021-07-20 18:29:21 +02:00
a919ac0aea
Merge branch 'write_ipdisplacements' of git.damask.mpie.de:damask/DAMASK into write_ipdisplacements
2021-07-20 15:35:48 +02:00
86d918367f
Round quadrature points
2021-07-20 15:34:13 +02:00
85735605f8
more flexibility for the L in the load case
...
Note that mixed boundary conditions for L introduce an ambiguity.
Consider:
L = [[1.0, x, x],
[ 0, 0, 0],
[ 0, 0, 0]]
P = [[x, 0, 0],
[x, x, x],
[x, x, x]]
What we need is F^(n+1)=F_dot^(n+1) x Delta_t, where F_dot^(n+1) is
F_dot^(n+1)_ij = L_ik F^n_kj.
So component F_11 has contributions from L_12 and L_13. We first assume
L_12=L_13=0 and then choose F^(n+1)_12 and F^(n+1)_13 to get
P_12=P_13=0. This implicitly gives a solution for L_12 and L_13, which
is however only one out of infinitely many.
2021-07-20 07:10:28 +02:00
03b7532cc5
numpy.MaskedArray behavior
2021-07-19 23:27:10 +02:00
1c1dc9383e
symbolic names
2021-07-19 22:30:20 +02:00
fe3bc1f8ee
[skip ci] updated version information after successful test of v3.0.0-alpha4-112-gb36da7378
2021-07-19 20:13:53 +02:00
4a2e62fdb2
Merge branch 'development' into 'write_ipdisplacements'
...
# Conflicts:
# src/mesh/mesh_mech_FEM.f90
2021-07-19 17:19:40 +00:00
b36da73786
Merge branch 'separating-physics' into 'development'
...
separate physics
See merge request damask/DAMASK!413
2021-07-19 15:46:40 +00:00
a654cd4fb1
To avoid fortran double variable truncation for quadrature points
2021-07-19 17:07:43 +02:00
28179963a2
avoid failing tests
2021-07-19 13:04:16 +02:00
97203ff551
document and keep definitions together
2021-07-18 23:30:30 +02:00
de428efca5
add_pole is working again
2021-07-18 18:58:05 +02:00
19ca99e033
matching name
2021-07-18 16:39:52 +02:00
86a60283c3
keep data close to where it is used
2021-07-18 16:34:42 +02:00
212a4ed63c
don't test implementation details
2021-07-18 15:57:51 +02:00
Martin Diehl