array access was wrong

now using the rectified dislocation density from "getRho". This results
in a slightly more conservative sensitivity check
This commit is contained in:
Martin Diehl 2019-03-17 11:51:26 +01:00
parent 1614bfb6d7
commit fa513778c0
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -2028,8 +2028,8 @@ results(instance)%rhoDotEdgeJogs(1:ns,o) = 2.0_pReal * rhoDotThermalAnnihilation
#endif
if ( any(stt%rho(:,mob) + rhoDot(1:ns,1:4) * timestep < -prm%aTolRho) &
.or. any(stt%rho(:,dip) + rhoDot(1:ns,9:10) * timestep < -prm%aTolRho)) then
if ( any(rho(:,mob) + rhoDot(1:ns,1:4) * timestep < -prm%aTolRho) &
.or. any(rho(:,dip) + rhoDot(1:ns,9:10) * timestep < -prm%aTolRho)) then
#ifdef DEBUG
if (iand(debug_level(debug_constitutive),debug_levelExtensive) /= 0_pInt) then
write(6,'(a,i5,a,i2)') '<< CONST >> evolution rate leads to negative density at el ',el,' ip ',ip
@ -2495,8 +2495,8 @@ function getRho(instance,of,ip,el)
getRho(:,mob) = max(getRho(:,mob),0.0_pReal)
getRho(:,dip) = max(getRho(:,dip),0.0_pReal)
where (abs(getRho) < max (prm%significantN/mesh_ipVolume(ip,el) ** (2.0_pReal/3.0_pReal), &
prm%significantRho)) getRho = 0.0_pReal
where(abs(getRho) < max(prm%significantN/mesh_ipVolume(ip,el) ** (2.0_pReal/3.0_pReal),prm%significantRho)) &
getRho = 0.0_pReal
end associate
end function getRho