output differs when using dEq0 instead of dEq(x,0.0)
revert this change for the moment, even though dEq0 seems to be more safe
This commit is contained in:
parent
9e76b51014
commit
d2b89a16e9
|
@ -1174,7 +1174,7 @@ end subroutine plastic_disloUCLA_dotState
|
|||
function plastic_disloUCLA_postResults(Tstar_v,Temperature,ipc,ip,el)
|
||||
use prec, only: &
|
||||
tol_math_check, &
|
||||
dEq0
|
||||
dEq
|
||||
use math, only: &
|
||||
pi
|
||||
use material, only: &
|
||||
|
@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ function plastic_disloUCLA_postResults(Tstar_v,Temperature,ipc,ip,el)
|
|||
c = c + ns
|
||||
elseif(plastic_disloUCLA_outputID(o,instance) == stress_exponent_ID) then
|
||||
do j = 1_pInt, ns
|
||||
if (dEq0(gdot_slip_pos(j)+gdot_slip_neg(j))) then
|
||||
if (dEq(gdot_slip_pos(j)+gdot_slip_neg(j),0.0_pReal)) then
|
||||
plastic_disloUCLA_postResults(c+j) = 0.0_pReal
|
||||
else
|
||||
plastic_disloUCLA_postResults(c+j) = (tau_slip_pos(j)+tau_slip_neg(j))/&
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue