Improved syntax for binary switches
This commit is contained in:
parent
50b372d9f1
commit
c71b060c48
|
@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ module plastic_dislotwin
|
|||
sum_N_sl, & !< total number of active slip system
|
||||
sum_N_tw, & !< total number of active twin system
|
||||
sum_N_tr, & !< total number of active transformation system
|
||||
climbSwitch !< Switch to decide climb
|
||||
ExtendedDislocations !< flag for existence of partial dislocations
|
||||
integer, dimension(:), allocatable :: &
|
||||
N_sl, & !< number of active slip systems for each family
|
||||
N_tw, & !< number of active twin systems for each family
|
||||
|
@ -281,8 +281,8 @@ subroutine plastic_dislotwin_init
|
|||
prm%SFE_0K = config%getFloat('sfe_0k',defaultVal = 0.0_pReal)
|
||||
prm%dSFE_dT = config%getFloat('dsfe_dt',defaultVal = 0.0_pReal)
|
||||
|
||||
prm%climbSwitch = config%getInt('climbswitch',defaultVal = 1)
|
||||
|
||||
prm%ExtendedDislocations = config%getInt('/ExtendedDislocations/',defaultVal = 1)
|
||||
|
||||
! multiplication factor according to slip system
|
||||
if (lattice_structure(p) == LATTICE_FCC_ID .or. lattice_structure(p) == LATTICE_HEX_ID ) then
|
||||
prm%omega = prm%omega * 12.0_pReal
|
||||
|
@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ subroutine plastic_dislotwin_dotState(Mp,T,instance,of)
|
|||
else
|
||||
! sigma_cl = norm2(matmul(Mp,prm%n0_sl(1:3,i))) ! ToDo: MD: correct?
|
||||
sigma_cl = DOT_PRODUCT(prm%n0_sl(1:3,i),matmul(Mp,prm%n0_sl(1:3,i)))
|
||||
if (prm%climbSwitch /= 0) then
|
||||
if (prm%ExtendedDislocations /= 0) then
|
||||
b_d = 24.0_pReal*PI*(1.0_pReal - prm%nu)/(2.0_pReal + prm%nu)* Gamma/(prm%mu*prm%b_sl(i))
|
||||
else
|
||||
b_d = 0.0_pReal
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue