Corrected the calculation of sigma_cl
This commit is contained in:
parent
d40e4a3800
commit
860ef2f256
|
@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ subroutine plastic_dislotwin_dotState(Mp,T,instance,of)
|
|||
v_cl, & !< climb velocity
|
||||
Gamma, & !< stacking fault energy
|
||||
tau, &
|
||||
sigma_cl, & ! ToDo: MD: good name? It is not a resolved stress but a different projection
|
||||
sigma_cl, &
|
||||
b_d
|
||||
real(pReal), dimension(param(instance)%sum_N_sl) :: &
|
||||
dot_rho_dip_formation, &
|
||||
|
@ -805,9 +805,9 @@ subroutine plastic_dislotwin_dotState(Mp,T,instance,of)
|
|||
if (dEq0(rho_dip_distance-rho_dip_distance_min(i))) then
|
||||
dot_rho_dip_climb(i) = 0.0_pReal
|
||||
else
|
||||
sigma_cl = norm2(matmul(Mp,prm%n0_sl(1:3,i))) ! ToDo: MD: correct?
|
||||
|
||||
if (prm%SFE_0K == 0.0_pReal) then ! ToDo: MD: I'm not really sure if this is correct. Maybe Gamma(0K) = 0
|
||||
! sigma_cl = norm2(matmul(Mp,prm%n0_sl(1:3,i))) ! ToDo: MD: correct?
|
||||
sigma_cl = DOT_PRODUCT(prm%n0_sl(1:3,i),matmul(Mp,prm%n0_sl(1:3,i)))
|
||||
if (prm%SFE_0K == 0.0_pReal) then
|
||||
b_d = 24.0_pReal*PI*(1.0_pReal - prm%nu)/(2.0_pReal + prm%nu)* Gamma/(prm%mu*prm%b_sl(i))
|
||||
else
|
||||
b_d = 1.0_pReal
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue