From 2e3de727ccf396d021116f2398d20126c2bbccfb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Diehl Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 07:27:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] hint at issues with the current parametrization --- .../phase/mechanical/plastic/dislotungsten_W.yaml | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/config/phase/mechanical/plastic/dislotungsten_W.yaml b/examples/config/phase/mechanical/plastic/dislotungsten_W.yaml index cb1d837a1..55814c3f8 100644 --- a/examples/config/phase/mechanical/plastic/dislotungsten_W.yaml +++ b/examples/config/phase/mechanical/plastic/dislotungsten_W.yaml @@ -20,13 +20,16 @@ tau_Peierls: [2.03e+9] h: [2.566e-10] h_sl-sl: [0.009, 0.72, 0.009, 0.05, 0.05, 0.06, 0.09] w: [2.992e-09] # 11b -i_sl: [1] # c, eq. (25) -D: 1.0e+20 # d_g, eq. (25) -D_a: 1.0 # d_edge = D_a*b # values in Cereceda et al. are high, using parameters from Gröger et al. a_nonSchmid: [0.0, 0.56, 0.75] # Table 2 -D_0: 0.0 # disable climb +# (almost) no annhilation, adjustment needed for simulations beyond the yield point +i_sl: [1] # c, eq. (25) +D: 1.0e+20 # d_g, eq. (25) +D_a: 1.0 # d_edge = D_a*b + +# disable climb (not discussed in Cereceda et al.) +D_0: 0.0 f_at: 1 Q_cl: 1.0