DAMASK_EICMD/examples/config/Phase_Isotropic_FreeSurface...

FreeSurface:
  lattice: cI
  mechanical:
    output: [F, P, F_e, F_p, L_p]
    elastic: {type: Hooke, C_11: 1.e+8, C_12: 1.e+6, C_44: 4.95e+7}
    plastic:
      type: isotropic
      output: [xi]
      xi_0: 0.3e+6
      xi_inf: 0.6e+6
      dot_gamma_0: 0.001
      n: 5
      M: 3
      h_0: 1.e+6
      a: 2
      dilatation: True
consistent names for keys 2021-03-25 19:36:45 +05:30			`FreeSurface:`
fixed symmetry handling - ort not tested, no examples, no documentation => removed - aP is the opposite of isotropic => removed isostropic materials can be easily specified as cI or cF, using C_44 = 1/2 * (C_11 - C_12). Acceptable extra effort for special use case orthorhombic can be easily implemented if needed, but needs test, documentation, and examples 2021-05-24 17:47:04 +05:30			`lattice: cI`
consistent names for keys 2021-03-25 19:36:45 +05:30			`mechanical:`
fixed Fe --> F_e and such 2021-02-22 21:54:44 +05:30			`output: [F, P, F_e, F_p, L_p]`
correct conversion to float 2021-06-29 14:52:42 +05:30			`elastic: {type: Hooke, C_11: 1.e+8, C_12: 1.e+6, C_44: 4.95e+7}`
consistent names for keys 2021-03-25 19:36:45 +05:30			`plastic:`
using consistent names for Bravais lattice in Fortran and Python 2020-11-29 03:07:03 +05:30			`type: isotropic`
			`output: [xi]`
python YAML is too picky/following v1.1 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30458977 2021-06-29 13:44:59 +05:30			`xi_0: 0.3e+6`
			`xi_inf: 0.6e+6`
using consistent names for Bravais lattice in Fortran and Python 2020-11-29 03:07:03 +05:30			`dot_gamma_0: 0.001`
			`n: 5`
			`M: 3`
correct conversion to float 2021-06-29 14:52:42 +05:30			`h_0: 1.e+6`
using consistent names for Bravais lattice in Fortran and Python 2020-11-29 03:07:03 +05:30			`a: 2`
more robust air stiffness values 2021-02-22 21:00:34 +05:30			`dilatation: True`