223031012
/
DAMASK_EICMD
mirror of https://github.com/achalhp/DAMASK_EICMD.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
DAMASK_EICMD/code/prec.f90

34 lines
888 B
Fortran
Raw Normal View History

added version information to all files do NOT edit text like this: $Id: constitutive_phenopowerlaw.f90 406 2009-08-31 14:13:10Z MPIE\f.roters $
2009-08-31 20:39:15 +05:30
!* $Id$
let's see whether this is the thing to do..!?!?
2007-03-20 19:25:22 +05:30
!##############################################################
MODULE prec
!##############################################################
openmp parallelization working again (at least for j2 and nonlocal constitutive model). In order to keep it like that, please follow these simple rules: DON'T use implicit array subscripts: example: real, dimension(3,3) :: A,B A(:,2) = B(:,1) <--- DON'T USE A(1:3,2) = B(1:3,1) <--- BETTER USE In many cases the use of explicit array subscripts is inevitable for parallelization. Additionally, it is an easy means to prevent memory leaks. Enclose all write statements with the following: !$OMP CRITICAL (write2out) <your write statement> !$OMP END CRITICAL (write2out) Whenever you change something in the code and are not sure if it affects parallelization and leads to nonconforming behavior, please ask me and/or Franz to check this.
2011-03-17 16:16:17 +05:30
implicit none
added a new module called numerics.f90 which reads in all numerical "parameters" from the file numerics.config (also being added). From now on this file has to be located in the working directory of the FEM-model and has to contain all necessary parameters.
2009-06-15 18:41:21 +05:30
moved all numerical parameters to prec.f90 removed some unused variables
2007-03-29 12:45:12 +05:30
! *** Precision of real and integer variables ***
openmp parallelization working again (at least for j2 and nonlocal constitutive model). In order to keep it like that, please follow these simple rules: DON'T use implicit array subscripts: example: real, dimension(3,3) :: A,B A(:,2) = B(:,1) <--- DON'T USE A(1:3,2) = B(1:3,1) <--- BETTER USE In many cases the use of explicit array subscripts is inevitable for parallelization. Additionally, it is an easy means to prevent memory leaks. Enclose all write statements with the following: !$OMP CRITICAL (write2out) <your write statement> !$OMP END CRITICAL (write2out) Whenever you change something in the code and are not sure if it affects parallelization and leads to nonconforming behavior, please ask me and/or Franz to check this.
2011-03-17 16:16:17 +05:30
integer, parameter :: pReal = selected_real_kind(15,300) ! 15 significant digits, up to 1e+-300
integer, parameter :: pInt = selected_int_kind(9) ! up to +- 1e9
integer, parameter :: pLongInt = 8 ! should be 64bit
real(pReal), parameter :: tol_math_check = 1.0e-8_pReal
real(pReal), parameter :: tol_gravityNodePos = 1.0e-100_pReal
some polishing for single precision version. Now only prec and mpie_spectral are needed in different versions
2011-02-25 18:11:46 +05:30
openmp parallelization working again (at least for j2 and nonlocal constitutive model). In order to keep it like that, please follow these simple rules: DON'T use implicit array subscripts: example: real, dimension(3,3) :: A,B A(:,2) = B(:,1) <--- DON'T USE A(1:3,2) = B(1:3,1) <--- BETTER USE In many cases the use of explicit array subscripts is inevitable for parallelization. Additionally, it is an easy means to prevent memory leaks. Enclose all write statements with the following: !$OMP CRITICAL (write2out) <your write statement> !$OMP END CRITICAL (write2out) Whenever you change something in the code and are not sure if it affects parallelization and leads to nonconforming behavior, please ask me and/or Franz to check this.
2011-03-17 16:16:17 +05:30
type :: p_vec
real(pReal), dimension(:), pointer :: p
end type p_vec
let's see whether this is the thing to do..!?!?
2007-03-20 19:25:22 +05:30
added version information to all files do NOT edit text like this: $Id: constitutive_phenopowerlaw.f90 406 2009-08-31 14:13:10Z MPIE\f.roters $
2009-08-31 20:39:15 +05:30
CONTAINS
subroutine prec_init
openmp parallelization working again (at least for j2 and nonlocal constitutive model). In order to keep it like that, please follow these simple rules: DON'T use implicit array subscripts: example: real, dimension(3,3) :: A,B A(:,2) = B(:,1) <--- DON'T USE A(1:3,2) = B(1:3,1) <--- BETTER USE In many cases the use of explicit array subscripts is inevitable for parallelization. Additionally, it is an easy means to prevent memory leaks. Enclose all write statements with the following: !$OMP CRITICAL (write2out) <your write statement> !$OMP END CRITICAL (write2out) Whenever you change something in the code and are not sure if it affects parallelization and leads to nonconforming behavior, please ask me and/or Franz to check this.
2011-03-17 16:16:17 +05:30
implicit none
some polishing for single precision version. Now only prec and mpie_spectral are needed in different versions
2011-02-25 18:11:46 +05:30
openmp parallelization working again (at least for j2 and nonlocal constitutive model). In order to keep it like that, please follow these simple rules: DON'T use implicit array subscripts: example: real, dimension(3,3) :: A,B A(:,2) = B(:,1) <--- DON'T USE A(1:3,2) = B(1:3,1) <--- BETTER USE In many cases the use of explicit array subscripts is inevitable for parallelization. Additionally, it is an easy means to prevent memory leaks. Enclose all write statements with the following: !$OMP CRITICAL (write2out) <your write statement> !$OMP END CRITICAL (write2out) Whenever you change something in the code and are not sure if it affects parallelization and leads to nonconforming behavior, please ask me and/or Franz to check this.
2011-03-17 16:16:17 +05:30
!$OMP CRITICAL (write2out)
write(6,*)
write(6,*) '<<<+- prec init -+>>>'
write(6,*) '$Id$'
write(6,*)
!$OMP END CRITICAL (write2out)
added version information to all files do NOT edit text like this: $Id: constitutive_phenopowerlaw.f90 406 2009-08-31 14:13:10Z MPIE\f.roters $
2009-08-31 20:39:15 +05:30
openmp parallelization working again (at least for j2 and nonlocal constitutive model). In order to keep it like that, please follow these simple rules: DON'T use implicit array subscripts: example: real, dimension(3,3) :: A,B A(:,2) = B(:,1) <--- DON'T USE A(1:3,2) = B(1:3,1) <--- BETTER USE In many cases the use of explicit array subscripts is inevitable for parallelization. Additionally, it is an easy means to prevent memory leaks. Enclose all write statements with the following: !$OMP CRITICAL (write2out) <your write statement> !$OMP END CRITICAL (write2out) Whenever you change something in the code and are not sure if it affects parallelization and leads to nonconforming behavior, please ask me and/or Franz to check this.
2011-03-17 16:16:17 +05:30
end subroutine
added version information to all files do NOT edit text like this: $Id: constitutive_phenopowerlaw.f90 406 2009-08-31 14:13:10Z MPIE\f.roters $
2009-08-31 20:39:15 +05:30
openmp parallelization working again (at least for j2 and nonlocal constitutive model). In order to keep it like that, please follow these simple rules: DON'T use implicit array subscripts: example: real, dimension(3,3) :: A,B A(:,2) = B(:,1) <--- DON'T USE A(1:3,2) = B(1:3,1) <--- BETTER USE In many cases the use of explicit array subscripts is inevitable for parallelization. Additionally, it is an easy means to prevent memory leaks. Enclose all write statements with the following: !$OMP CRITICAL (write2out) <your write statement> !$OMP END CRITICAL (write2out) Whenever you change something in the code and are not sure if it affects parallelization and leads to nonconforming behavior, please ask me and/or Franz to check this.
2011-03-17 16:16:17 +05:30
END MODULE prec